You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The docs currently have a random mix of terminology for the number of points. This issue is especially convoluted because ref_points need not coincide with points.
We should standardize the terminology around this and update all docstrings in freud to match. This is related to #179, and also somewhat to #180.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm actually not 100% sure what to do with this. We've updated the majority of the APIs, and in particular removing the num_particles properties from most things has made this much easier. However, I'm not sure if we should update all the docstrings; some methods really are about particles. For example, does it make sense to change things in environment like BondOrder or LocalDescriptors to just discuss points in the docstrings? I'm not sure what the answer is, would like to discuss a bit more before deciding.
The docs currently have a random mix of terminology for the number of points. This issue is especially convoluted because ref_points need not coincide with points.
We should standardize the terminology around this and update all docstrings in freud to match. This is related to #179, and also somewhat to #180.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: