"vendor" missing in archive.

[remicollet]

In glpi-0.9.1RC2 the "vendor" directory is missing.

[remicollet]

More: permissions are strange (also affects 0.90), directory should be rwxr-xr-x

$ tar tvzf /tmp/glpi-9.1RC2.tar.gz  | grep "^d"
drwx------ adelaunay/adelaunay     0 2016-07-27 14:45 glpi/files/_cron/
drwx------ adelaunay/adelaunay      0 2016-07-27 14:45 glpi/lib/tiny_mce/plugins/visualblocks/css/
drwx------ adelaunay/adelaunay      0 2016-07-27 14:45 glpi/lib/tiny_mce/plugins/media/
drwx------ adelaunay/adelaunay      0 2016-07-27 14:45 glpi/lib/jqueryplugins/jquery-gantt/img/
drwx------ adelaunay/adelaunay      0 2016-07-27 14:45 glpi/lib/
drwx------ adelaunay/adelaunay      0 2016-07-27 14:45 glpi/install/mysql/
...

[orthagh]

i pushed a new archive for RC2 with theses fixes

[ddurieux]

So it's a RC3 ...

[orthagh]

No, i replaced the archive for the rc2 tag with the rc2 files (and added the missing folder and fix the permission).

[ddurieux]

That I mean, you have modified a released version, so you may not update it but create a RC3 ;)

[mohierf]

I do agree with @ddurieux ... you should not release a "false" new RC2 but an RC3 version ...

[orthagh]

I don't know if you really see what i mean, i didn't change the released version, the tag still at the same place. it's the published archive (and not the release), i fixed
I don't want anyone to keep missing essentially files when testing current rc (in fact, it's broken).

Anyway, a RC3 is planned for soon, and i'll try to avoid bad archives

[ddurieux]

It's pre-release (it's same) and it's tagged, so no you never update an archive annouced/released/pre-released 4 weeks ago with update files, so it will be increased with a new tag + so RC3

[orthagh]

ok for the delay (i shutdown all communications this last weeks), it's not the best.

Let's close this discussion, i'll release a RC3 next week.

[mohierf]

Anyone that already got the archive will have a bad RC2 ... thinkin he got the good one you just modified. I hope those people will not loose too many time on problems they should have had :(

[orthagh]

We agree.
the problem: they had a message ask them to install dependencies with composer (see #896).
The error is not really blocking, but annoying.

The today fix is temporary, i have another issues to review/fix before shipping a new rc (a few days of work, i think).
Waiting for, i though it was good to fix archive to avoid this issue. For the users.