Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Store trait related cfg features, #1091

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 11, 2023
Merged

Conversation

panarch
Copy link
Member

@panarch panarch commented Feb 10, 2023

Enable all by default.

Compile time feature control causes too much management cost.
We already have test cases in test-suite splitted based on store trait features.

@panarch panarch added the improvement Improvements for existing features label Feb 10, 2023
@panarch panarch self-assigned this Feb 10, 2023
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 10, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4144994883

  • 43 of 43 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • 44 unchanged lines in 4 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.06%) to 98.569%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
core/src/executor/execute.rs 1 92.02%
core/src/executor/alter/table.rs 6 94.92%
core/src/data/value/convert.rs 11 98.87%
core/src/executor/aggregate/mod.rs 26 86.87%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 4144507324: -0.06%
Covered Lines: 39545
Relevant Lines: 40119

💛 - Coveralls

@panarch panarch marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2023 15:04
Copy link
Member

@ever0de ever0de left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code looks good. Would it be possible to update the README as there are some outdated sections present

@panarch
Copy link
Member Author

panarch commented Feb 11, 2023

This code looks good. Would it be possible to update the README as there are some outdated sections present

v0.14 release will be .. next month so it would be too early to update README at this moment.
We also have plan to write the user guide document so I'll update README later with the doc.

@panarch panarch merged commit e17d45b into main Feb 11, 2023
@panarch panarch deleted the remove-store-cfg-features branch February 11, 2023 04:37
devgony pushed a commit to devgony/gluesql that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2023
Enable all by default.

Compile time feature control causes too much management cost.
We already have test cases in test-suite splitted based on store trait features.
devgony added a commit to devgony/gluesql that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2023
Remove Store trait related cfg features, (gluesql#1091)

Enable all by default.

Compile time feature control causes too much management cost.
We already have test cases in test-suite splitted based on store trait features.

Support `values` query in AST builder (gluesql#1041)

Currently, ASTBuilder does not support Values Query yet.
This PR supports Values Query in ASTBuilder

e.g.
let actual = values(vec!["1, 'a'", "2, 'b'"])
    .order_by(vec!["column1 desc"])
    .build();
let expected = "VALUES(1, 'a'), (2, 'b') ORDER BY column1 desc";
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improvements for existing features
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants