Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Temporary fix for invalid selinux issue, due to upstream issue in template module in ansible #551

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Apr 13, 2020

Conversation

pkesavap
Copy link
Member

This change is a workaround for an upstream issue with template module ansible/ansible#56243 (comment)

This change is a workround for the error invalid selinux context issue
resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821907

Signed-off-by: Prajith Kesava Prasad pkesavap@redhat.com

Prajith Kesava Prasad added 4 commits April 12, 2020 19:48
…ansible/ansible#56243 (comment)

    This change is a workround for the error invalid selinux context issue
    resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821907

Signed-off-by: Prajith Kesava Prasad <pkesavap@redhat.com>
…a" , it throws "ValueError: File context for {{mount path}} already defined"

So a pretask which deletes the label which corresponds to the existing mount points is added
resolves:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820728

Signed-off-by: Prajith Kesava Prasad <pkesavap@redhat.com>
…a" , it throws "ValueError: File context for {{mount path}} already defined"

So a pretask which deletes the label which corresponds to the existing mount points is added
resolves:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820728

Signed-off-by: Prajith Kesava Prasad <pkesavap@redhat.com>
@gobindadas gobindadas self-requested a review April 13, 2020 04:32
@pkesavap pkesavap merged commit e995491 into gluster:3.0.0 Apr 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants