Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The MBR extended implementation causes a problem with a non-MBR configuration #473

Closed
robertkirkman opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #475
Closed

The MBR extended implementation causes a problem with a non-MBR configuration #473

robertkirkman opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #475

Comments

@robertkirkman
Copy link

Hi I don't know enough about the project yet to know how to create a minimal reproducible example, but when i use this file with debos, if I use commit 03ec3cb of debos it works but if I use commit da773cc or any of the recent commits after that, the debos command gets stuck inside the fakemachine because of a partition named "extended" getting incorrectly created in the wrong place even though the .yaml file specifies gpt and not mbr

If I have time I will try to create a minimal reproducible example

sjoerdsimons added a commit to sjoerdsimons/debos that referenced this issue Jan 20, 2024
The extended partition handling for msdos accidentally got applied to
all partition types. Ensure and be more defensive against msdos special
handling getting applied to other partition types

Fixes: go-debos#473
sjoerdsimons added a commit to sjoerdsimons/debos that referenced this issue Jan 20, 2024
The extended partition handling for msdos accidentally got applied to
all partition types. Ensure and be more defensive against msdos special
handling getting applied to other partition types

Fixes: go-debos#473
@robertkirkman
Copy link
Author

Thank you I tested that patch and the same .yaml file I tested with the other 2 versions of debos works with your msdos-fixes branch!

@sjoerdsimons sjoerdsimons linked a pull request Jan 20, 2024 that will close this issue
@sjoerdsimons
Copy link
Member

Thanks for testing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants