Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update crypto vendors #10385

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2020
Merged

Update crypto vendors #10385

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2020

Conversation

techknowlogick
Copy link
Member

as title

@techknowlogick techknowlogick added type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality. backport/v1.11 labels Feb 20, 2020
@techknowlogick techknowlogick added this to the 1.12.0 milestone Feb 20, 2020
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Feb 20, 2020
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Feb 20, 2020
sapk
sapk approved these changes Feb 20, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@sapk sapk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but why ?

@techknowlogick
Copy link
Member Author

ping LG-TM

@techknowlogick techknowlogick merged commit 63a6e71 into go-gitea:master Feb 20, 2020
@techknowlogick techknowlogick deleted the update-crypto branch February 20, 2020 21:03
@kolaente
Copy link
Member

Does this need backporting?

@sapk
Copy link
Member

sapk commented Feb 21, 2020

@kolaente yes

@guillep2k guillep2k mentioned this pull request Feb 21, 2020
Merged
@guillep2k guillep2k added the backport/done All backports for this PR have been created label Feb 21, 2020
@acohn
Copy link

acohn commented Feb 27, 2020

Is this a fix for CVE-2020-9283 when using the builtin SSH server?

@sapk
Copy link
Member

sapk commented Feb 27, 2020

@acohn yes this has been discussed on discord channel and I think it would be disclosed when 1.11.2 is released.

@zeripath zeripath changed the title update crypto vendors Update crypto vendors Mar 6, 2020
@zeripath zeripath added the topic/security Something leaks user information or is otherwise vulnerable. Should be fixed! label Mar 6, 2020
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@zeripath zeripath zeripath approved these changes

@sapk sapk sapk approved these changes

@kolaente kolaente kolaente approved these changes

@jolheiser jolheiser jolheiser approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
backport/done All backports for this PR have been created lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. topic/security Something leaks user information or is otherwise vulnerable. Should be fixed! type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.12.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
8 participants
@techknowlogick @kolaente @sapk @acohn @zeripath @jolheiser @guillep2k @GiteaBot