Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Name Variable #20190

Open
C-EO opened this issue Jun 30, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Name Variable #20190

C-EO opened this issue Jun 30, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.

Comments

@C-EO
Copy link

C-EO commented Jun 30, 2022

Feature Description

I think it would be great if Gitea used the name variable from the app.ini file to replace the word Gitea on certain parts of the system. For example: I was setting up OAuth for my instance of Gitea and I was testing the account linking using my admin account. I discovered, that whereas the name of the instatnce is changed on certain parts of the site, some parts like /user/settings/security under the account linking section have the name Gitea still being used yet the site has a different name.

I kindly request if you could rectify this issue.

@C-EO

Screenshots

image

@C-EO C-EO added type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first. labels Jun 30, 2022
@C-EO C-EO changed the title Account Linking Name Variable Jun 30, 2022
@jolheiser
Copy link
Member

But the software being used is still Gitea, even if you've named it something else.

Someone searching for a problem on Nitehub is unlikely to find help as opposed to Gitea.

@C-EO
Copy link
Author

C-EO commented Jul 1, 2022

@jolheiser Yes, as the fact is true that the software being used is still Gitea, I think that when you don't give the software user a bit more control, it makes it go back on Gitea's vision somehow

@C-EO
Copy link
Author

C-EO commented Jul 1, 2022

It wouldn't be bad to leave it as Gitea, but if the software user wants more personalization while still giving credit, I think the footer at the bottom already gives Gitea a lot of credit.

@C-EO
Copy link
Author

C-EO commented Jul 1, 2022

Plus there more ways Gitea remains with credit. For example, the 'Help' link.
Since the instance uses Gitea, that means the user always refers to Gitea's docs and so do his clients.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants