Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor issue template parsing and fix API endpoint (#29069) #29140

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

wxiaoguang
Copy link
Contributor

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang commented Feb 12, 2024

Backport #29069

The old code GetTemplatesFromDefaultBranch(...) ([]*api.IssueTemplate, map[string]error) doesn't really follow Golang's habits, then the second returned value might be misused. For example, the API function GetIssueTemplates incorrectly checked the second returned value and always responds 500 error.

This PR refactors GetTemplatesFromDefaultBranch to ParseTemplatesFromDefaultBranch and clarifies its behavior, and fixes the API endpoint bug, and adds some tests.

And by the way, add proper prefix X- for the header generated in checkDeprecatedAuthMethods, because non-standard HTTP headers should have X- prefix, and it is also consistent with the new code in GetIssueTemplates

The old code `GetTemplatesFromDefaultBranch(...) ([]*api.IssueTemplate,
map[string]error)` doesn't really follow Golang's habits, then the
second returned value might be misused. For example, the API function
`GetIssueTemplates` incorrectly checked the second returned value and
always responds 500 error.

This PR refactors GetTemplatesFromDefaultBranch to
ParseTemplatesFromDefaultBranch and clarifies its behavior, and fixes the
API endpoint bug, and adds some tests.

And by the way, add proper prefix `X-` for the header generated in
`checkDeprecatedAuthMethods`, because non-standard HTTP headers should
have `X-` prefix, and it is also consistent with the new code in
`GetIssueTemplates`
# Conflicts:
#	routers/web/repo/issue.go
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.21.6 milestone Feb 12, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Feb 12, 2024
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 12, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the modifies/api This PR adds API routes or modifies them label Feb 12, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Feb 12, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Feb 14, 2024
@silverwind silverwind added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Feb 14, 2024
@silverwind silverwind enabled auto-merge (squash) February 14, 2024 01:12
@silverwind silverwind merged commit dd8bc1d into go-gitea:release/v1.21 Feb 14, 2024
26 checks passed
@GiteaBot GiteaBot removed the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Feb 14, 2024
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang deleted the backport-issue-template branch February 14, 2024 04:24
Copy link

Automatically locked because of our CONTRIBUTING guidelines

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 29, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. modifies/api This PR adds API routes or modifies them size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants