Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix ScanAllDocs and ScanAllValues to accept the proper ResultSet type again #772

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2023

Conversation

flimzy
Copy link
Member

@flimzy flimzy commented Sep 26, 2023

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (cfc44d0) 79.60% compared to head (610d8bb) 79.60%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #772   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.60%   79.60%           
=======================================
  Files         167      167           
  Lines       13180    13180           
=======================================
  Hits        10492    10492           
  Misses       2245     2245           
  Partials      443      443           
Files Coverage Δ
resultset.go 66.94% <66.66%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@flimzy flimzy merged commit 03ec484 into master Sep 26, 2023
2 of 3 checks passed
@flimzy flimzy deleted the scanAll branch September 26, 2023 20:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant