Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build a multi-arch Docker image. Intended to close #215 #298

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

paul-snively
Copy link

This pull request revises the Dockerfile to use the xx Docker cross-compilation helpers and the Makefile to use Docker's buildx extension to build a multi-arch image.

@paul-snively
Copy link
Author

@goccy, please forgive the imposition, but might I ask when this might be reviewed and, if acceptable, merged? I could change the package name in my fork and publish my own image, but my feeling is that would be undesirable compared to helping with the main project. But I also have colleagues at work who would benefit from its availability, so I wonder what a reasonable timeframe to expect is. Thank you so much for all your hard and good work on this!

@ohaibbq
Copy link
Contributor

ohaibbq commented Apr 19, 2024

it seems silly for me to speak on goccy's behalf, but in my experience contributing over the last few months, they only have time to review and do releases every couple weeks, normally on the weekends. A sponsorship to the project also helps responsiveness!

We maintain a fork for our internal usages and open up PRs against both the upstream repository and our fork. If it is urgently blocking, i.e. you can't use the --platform linux/amd64 flag, I'd recommend doing the same.

The only thing you should need to change is the Github Images repository that the action publishes to in .github/workflows/build.yml

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants