You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I like the mathematical formula in pandoc mode, because it is more consistent with latex, but I look forward to the TOC in Goldmark
$$
\begin{aligned}y &= sin(x),\\
y &= cos(x), \\
y &= \dfrac{1}{1+e^{(-x)}},\\
y &= x^2 .
\end{aligned}
$$
eg:Rendering HTML with Katex in pandoc,there is no problem。 But the article lacks a table of contents。
Rendering HTML with Katex in goldmark,There is a table of contents, but there is something wrong with the mathematical formula。 as follow
Is there any other way to display both the mathematical formula (which is expected to be more consistent with latex's mathematical formula) and the table of contents?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From the rendered output,
it can be observed that goldmark had interpreted \\ (as Markdown) into \before KaTeX did its work. I know that an HTML division <div> can show this interpretation. However, that doesn't work for inline <span>.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. The resources of the Hugo team are limited, and so we are asking for your help.
If this is a bug and you can still reproduce this error on the master branch, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.
If this is a feature request, and you feel that it is still relevant and valuable, please tell us why.
This issue will automatically be closed in the near future if no further activity occurs. Thank you for all your contributions.
I like the mathematical formula in pandoc mode, because it is more consistent with latex, but I look forward to the TOC in Goldmark
eg:Rendering HTML with Katex in pandoc,there is no problem。 But the article lacks a table of contents。
Rendering HTML with Katex in goldmark,There is a table of contents, but there is something wrong with the mathematical formula。 as follow
Is there any other way to display both the mathematical formula (which is expected to be more consistent with latex's mathematical formula) and the table of contents?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: