Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove transaction from Ingestion #480

Merged

Conversation

imjuanleonard
Copy link
Contributor

@imjuanleonard imjuanleonard commented Feb 18, 2020

QA this change first

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @imjuanleonard. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a gojek member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@imjuanleonard imjuanleonard changed the title Remove multi pipeline [WIP] Remove transaction from Ingestion Feb 18, 2020
@imjuanleonard
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@imjuanleonard: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/test all

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@woop
Copy link
Member

woop commented Feb 18, 2020

/ok-to-test

@imjuanleonard imjuanleonard changed the title [WIP] Remove transaction from Ingestion Remove transaction from Ingestion Feb 20, 2020
@davidheryanto
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@davidheryanto
Copy link
Collaborator

davidheryanto commented Feb 24, 2020

This is to ensure that Redis write in ingestion code does not unnecessarily block all other clients during writing. Since currently in Feast v0.4, this Redis is also shared by Feast Serving, if Feast Ingestion somehow attempts too much write (due to retry maybe or connection error maybe), excessive Redis locks may be used. Redis clients in Feast serving will be blocked and this leads to increased latency in Feast serving (which is usually latency sensitive).

Locks/transaction is not really necessary in this case (it is good to have). Atomic writes of a batch of feature values are not really needed because these it's ok it these writes command in a batch are interleaved with other commands, without resulting in corrupted feature values

@davidheryanto
Copy link
Collaborator

/approve

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: davidheryanto, imjuanleonard

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@imjuanleonard
Copy link
Contributor Author

some panda library TypeError because of time
pandas/_libs/tslibs/timestamps.pyx:413: TypeError
TypeError: Timestamp subtraction must have the same timezones or no timezones

I guess this is similar to another pipeline

@imjuanleonard
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @davidheryanto

@davidheryanto
Copy link
Collaborator

/retest
Previous test failure due to new version of fastavro. Master branch currenly set a fixed version for fastavro.

@imjuanleonard
Copy link
Contributor Author

/lgtm

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@imjuanleonard: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@woop
Copy link
Member

woop commented Feb 25, 2020

/lgtm

@feast-ci-bot feast-ci-bot merged commit c3591ed into feast-dev:master Feb 25, 2020
davidheryanto pushed a commit to davidheryanto/feast that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2020
zhilingc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2020
@imjuanleonard imjuanleonard deleted the remove-pipeline-from-redis branch March 22, 2020 20:38
@ches ches added the backport-candidate Changes that may be desired for backport to earlier Feast release tracks label May 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved backport-candidate Changes that may be desired for backport to earlier Feast release tracks lgtm ok-to-test size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants