runtime: sysUsed often called on non-scavenged memory #36603
Comments
Hello @mknyszek, thank you for reporting this and for the details! Given that we haven't covered much ground for Go1.15 on this issue, is there something else we can do or shall we move it to Go1.16 and then backport fixes to Go1.14 and Go1.15? Thank you. |
This isn't essential. Let's move it to 1.16. No need to backport, either, the performance regression here is very slight in practice (even in microbenchmarks that specifically seem to trigger bad behavior here), and other improvements probably totally overcame it in practice. Worth fixing, but not with any urgency. |
Thank you Michael! Moving it to Go1.16. |
Howdy @mknyszek! Shall we punt to Go1.17 or Backlog? Thank you, and happy holidays! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In working on #36507, I noticed that one source of regression on Darwin was that
sysUsed
, as of Go 1.14, is now called on the whole memory allocation, even if just one page of that is actually scavenged. This behavior was already present in Go 1.11, went away in Go 1.12, and is now back.On systems where
sysUsed
is a no-op and we rely on the first access "unscavenging" the page, this has no effect, because we're already only unscavenging exactly what's needed. On systems like Darwin and Windows where the "recommit" step is explicit (i.e.sysUsed
is not a no-op) this can have a non-trivial impact on performance, since the kernel probably walks over the unscavenged pages for nothing.This contributed very slightly to the performance regression in #36218, but not enough to cause it to block the 1.14 release.
The fix here is straight-forward: we just need to lower the call of
sysUsed
in the page allocator where we have complete information over exactly which pages are scavenged. If a given allocation has >50% of its pages scavenged then we can probably justsysUsed
the whole thing to save a bit on syscall overheads. This change also makes sense because we already dosysUnused
at a fairly low-level part of the page allocator, so bringingsysUsed
down there makes sense.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: