Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

net: TestSendfilePipe failures with "Read did not time out" #41327

Open
bcmills opened this issue Sep 10, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

net: TestSendfilePipe failures with "Read did not time out" #41327

bcmills opened this issue Sep 10, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.
Milestone

Comments

@bcmills
Copy link
Contributor

bcmills commented Sep 10, 2020

--- FAIL: TestSendfilePipe (0.05s)
    sendfile_test.go:310: Read did not time out
FAIL
FAIL	net	9.705s

2020-09-10T02:22:19-dfdc388/linux-arm64-aws
2019-10-25T18:44:06-096126d/darwin-arm64-corellium
2019-09-04T15:10:03-033299f/darwin-arm64-corellium
2019-08-28T02:29:54-22355d6/darwin-arm64-corellium
2019-08-27T17:00:43-483d6d9/darwin-arm64-corellium

It's not obvious to me whether this is a bug in the test's expectations or setup, or the result of slower-than-expected execution on these builders.

CC @mikioh @bradfitz @ianlancetaylor

@bcmills bcmills added arch-arm64 NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one. labels Sep 10, 2020
@bcmills bcmills added this to the Backlog milestone Sep 10, 2020
@bcmills
Copy link
Contributor Author

bcmills commented Apr 14, 2021

This failure mode is apparently not exclusive to arm64, so I suspect that the test is too timing-sensitive.
2021-04-14T16:18:34-ad44dfb/illumos-amd64
2021-03-30T01:17:14-a95454b/illumos-amd64

@bcmills bcmills changed the title net: failures in TestSendfilePipe on arm64 platforms net: TestSendfilePipe failures with "Read did not time out" Apr 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant