Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add gocheckcompilerdirectives #3463

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 21, 2023
Merged

feat: add gocheckcompilerdirectives #3463

merged 9 commits into from
Jan 21, 2023

Conversation

leighmcculloch
Copy link
Contributor

@leighmcculloch leighmcculloch commented Jan 7, 2023

Add gocheckcompilerdirectives that checks that compiler directives (//go: comments) are valid, and catches easy mistakes.

https://github.com/leighmcculloch/gocheckcompilerdirectives

Compiler directives are comments in the form of //go: that provide an instruction to the compiler. For example, //go:generate, //go:embed, //go:build, etc.

Compiler directives are easy to make mistakes with. The linter will detect the following mistakes.

  1. Adding a space in between the comment bars and the first character, e.g. // go:, will cause the compiler to silently ignore the comment.

  2. Mistyping a directives name, e.g. //go:embod, will cause the compiler to silently ignore the comment.

@boring-cyborg
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Jan 7, 2023

Hey, thank you for opening your first Pull Request !

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jan 7, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@leighmcculloch leighmcculloch changed the title Add gocheckdirectives feat: add gocheckdirectives Jan 7, 2023
@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Jan 7, 2023

In order for a pull request adding a linter to be reviewed, the linter and the PR must follow some requirements.

Pull Request Description

  • It must have a link to the linter repository.
  • It must provide a short description of the linter.

Linter

  • It must not be a duplicate of another linter or a rule of a linter. (the team will help to verify that)
  • It must have a valid license (AGPL is not allowed) and the file must contain the required information by the license, ex: author, year, etc.
  • The linter repository must have a CI and tests.
  • It must use go/analysis.
  • It must have a valid tag, ex: v1.0.0, v0.1.0.
  • It must not contain init().
  • It must not contain panic(), log.fatal(), os.exit(), or similar.
  • It must not have false positives/negatives. (the team will help to verify that)
  • It must have tests inside golangci-lint.

The Linter Tests Inside Golangci-lint

  • They must have at least one std lib import.
  • They must work with T=<name of the linter test file>.go make test_linters. (the team will help to verify that)

.golangci.reference.yml

  • The linter must be added to the list of available linters (alphabetical case-insensitive order).
    • enable and disable options
  • If the linter has a configuration, the exhaustive configuration of the linter must be added (alphabetical case-insensitive order)
    • The values must be different from the default ones.
    • The default values must be defined in a comment.
    • The option must have a short description.

Others Requirements

  • The files (tests and linter) inside golangci-lint must have the same name as the linter.
  • The .golangci.yml of golangci-lint itself must not be edited and the linter must not be added to this file.
  • The linters must be sorted in the alphabetical order (case-insensitive) in the Manager.GetAllSupportedLinterConfigs(...) and .golangci.reference.yml.
  • The load mode (WithLoadMode(...)):
    • if the linter doesn't use types: goanalysis.LoadModeSyntax
    • goanalysis.LoadModeTypesInfo required WithLoadForGoAnalysis() in the Manager.GetAllSupportedLinterConfigs(...)
  • The version in WithSince(...) must be the next minor version (v1.X.0) of golangci-lint.

Recommendations

  • The linter should not use SSA. (currently, SSA does not support generics)
  • The linter repository should have a readme and linting.
  • The linter should be published as a binary. (useful to diagnose bug origins)

The golangci-lint team will edit this comment to check the boxes before and during the review.

This checklist does not imply that we will accept the linter.

@ldez ldez added the linter: new Support new linter label Jan 7, 2023
.golangci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@leighmcculloch
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ldez Thanks for posting the list of instructions. I've reviewed the list and after making a couple changes to the PR I believe it satisfies the requirements.

@ldez ldez self-requested a review January 7, 2023 17:51
@ldez ldez added the feedback required Requires additional feedback label Jan 8, 2023
@leighmcculloch

This comment was marked as outdated.

@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Jan 12, 2023

I would like to suggest another name for your linter because "directives" is a generic term (for example replace or require in a go.mod are directives).
So I suggest something like checkgocompilerdirectives

https://pkg.go.dev/cmd/compile#hdr-Compiler_Directives

@leighmcculloch
Copy link
Contributor Author

leighmcculloch commented Jan 12, 2023

That's a good idea, I'd be happy to rename it. I'll rename it to gocheckcompilerdirectives. Does that work for you?

@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Jan 12, 2023

gocheck is an existing tool.

it can be gocompilerdirectiveslint

@leighmcculloch
Copy link
Contributor Author

leighmcculloch commented Jan 12, 2023

gocheck is an existing tool

I also maintain gochecknoglobals, gochecknoinits. That's the pattern I name my linters. I don't think I can rename the others at this point.

@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Jan 12, 2023

That's the pattern I name my linters. I don't think I can rename the others at this point.

It's always possible to change or at least to use a new pattern 😉

@leighmcculloch
Copy link
Contributor Author

leighmcculloch commented Jan 14, 2023

I've pushed a change to this pull request updating the name of the linter to gocheckcompilerdirectives to more accurately reflect what is being checked. I kept the gocheck prefix because that's what my small suite of linters all use and I'd like to keep them consistently named. As far as I know this has not caused any confusion so far and gochecknoglobals and gochecknoinits have been in golangci-lint for sometime.

@leighmcculloch leighmcculloch changed the title feat: add gocheckdirectives feat: add gocheckcompilerdirectives Jan 14, 2023
@leighmcculloch

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Member

@ldez ldez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the linter position in the manager is not right (alphabetically ordered)

Edit: misread

pkg/golinters/gocheckdirectives.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/golinters/gocheckdirectives.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@leighmcculloch
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ldez Thanks for re-reviewing. I've merged the two suggested changes removing the config. Thanks, I didn't realize I could simply pass nil when no config was available.

@ldez ldez removed the feedback required Requires additional feedback label Jan 20, 2023
leighmcculloch and others added 2 commits January 21, 2023 13:43
Co-authored-by: Ludovic Fernandez <ldez@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@ldez ldez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ldez ldez enabled auto-merge (squash) January 21, 2023 12:43
@ldez ldez merged commit d5d671f into golangci:master Jan 21, 2023
@leighmcculloch leighmcculloch deleted the gocheckdirectives branch January 24, 2023 22:28
SeigeC pushed a commit to SeigeC/golangci-lint that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2023
@ldez ldez added this to the v1.51 milestone Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
linter: new Support new linter
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants