Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Entity as trait #10

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 2, 2017
Merged

Entity as trait #10

merged 2 commits into from
May 2, 2017

Conversation

mabrcosta
Copy link
Contributor

Making the Entity an abstract class creates limitations of what can be achieved with the entities case classes. The same goal can be achieved without those by converting it to a trait .

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 1a72d1a on mabrcosta:master into 53cbfab on gonmarques:master.

@gonmarques
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

Fair point. I guess that the same applies to VersionedEntity. In order to keep things consistent, can you please update the PR with this additional change?

@mabrcosta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi,

Sure. Looks like I missed that one. Added a new commit with the VersionedEntity change as well.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 312091b on mabrcosta:master into 53cbfab on gonmarques:master.

@gonmarques gonmarques merged commit 312091b into gonmarques:master May 2, 2017
@gonmarques
Copy link
Owner

This change was released in 1.4.3. Thank you for your contribution 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants