This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2019. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't this imply that the test is wrong, and thus a panic is more applicable?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it may be the case that an edge has been created to a node that has not yet been seen due to the test.g range loop. For example in the first Tarjan test case:
The first edge {0,1} creates the node 1, so by the time we get to adding node 1 explicitly, it is already there.
The API allows creation of both nodes implicitly during an
AddDirectedEdge
call and I will probably change these and others to that later, but here I want to be explicit until the API redesign has been more fully fleshed out (see #45 in particular).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@btracey Are you OK with this to be merged?