Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implementing Having Clause for bindings and node literals. #100

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 13, 2019
Merged

Implementing Having Clause for bindings and node literals. #100

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 13, 2019

Conversation

rbkloss
Copy link
Collaborator

@rbkloss rbkloss commented Dec 11, 2019

This should make it possible the following clauses:

  • HAVING NOT(?s = /_<some_id>)
  • HAVING ?s > /_<some_id>)

etc...

xllora
xllora reviewed Dec 13, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@xllora xllora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @rbkloss. Yay, long time pending feature request.

@xllora xllora merged commit db6ac6e into google:master Dec 13, 2019
@rbkloss rbkloss deleted the having-binding-node branch December 13, 2019 19:41
@rogerlucena rogerlucena mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@xllora xllora xllora left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@rbkloss @xllora