Fix support for comparison between ID/TYPE bindings and text literals inside HAVING clauses

[rogerlucena]

Previously, comparisons between ID bindings and text literals inside HAVING clauses (such as below) were not effective:

SELECT ?s, ?predID, ?o
FROM ?family
WHERE {
  ?s ?p ID ?predID ?o
}
HAVING ?predID < "parent_of"^^type:text;

Now, they are fully supported (<, > and =), proceeding as a lexicographical comparison between the ID binding and the text literal that follows.

The same is now supported for bindings created using the TYPE keyword too.

Error handling for comparison expressions were also improved.

[googlebot]

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

[googlebot]

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

[thiagovas]

@googlebot I fixed it.

[googlebot]

CLAs look good, thanks!

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

[Tati1701]

Thanks, Roger! I hope this helps :)