[NTI] Bugfix for the banned-property conformance check.

Fixes #2280 on github. ------------- Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=147058204
google · Feb 10, 2017 · 85764a1 · 85764a1
1 parent 7bd84ba
commit 85764a1
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 26 additions and 14 deletions.
diff --git a/src/com/google/javascript/jscomp/ConformanceRules.java b/src/com/google/javascript/jscomp/ConformanceRules.java
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@
 import com.google.javascript.rhino.TypeI;
 import com.google.javascript.rhino.TypeIRegistry;
 import com.google.javascript.rhino.jstype.JSTypeNative;
-
 import java.lang.reflect.Constructor;
 import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
 import java.util.ArrayList;
@@ -46,7 +45,6 @@
 import java.util.Set;
 import java.util.regex.Pattern;
 import java.util.regex.PatternSyntaxException;
-
 import javax.annotation.Nullable;
 
 /**
@@ -502,23 +500,26 @@ protected ConformanceResult checkConformance(NodeTraversal t, Node n) {
     private ConformanceResult checkConformance(NodeTraversal t, Node n, Property prop) {
       if (isCandidatePropUse(n, prop)) {
         TypeIRegistry registry = t.getCompiler().getTypeIRegistry();
-        TypeI methodClassType = registry.getType(prop.type);
+        TypeI typeWithBannedProp = registry.getType(prop.type);
         Node lhs = n.getFirstChild();
-        if (methodClassType != null && lhs.getTypeI() != null) {
+        if (typeWithBannedProp != null && lhs.getTypeI() != null) {
-          TypeI targetType = lhs.getTypeI().restrictByNotNullOrUndefined();
+          TypeI foundType = lhs.getTypeI().restrictByNotNullOrUndefined();
-          if (targetType.isSomeUnknownType()
+          if (foundType.toMaybeObjectType() != null
-             || targetType.isTypeVariable()
+              && foundType.toMaybeObjectType().isGeneric()) {
-             || targetType.isBottom()
+            foundType = foundType.toMaybeObjectType().getRawType();
-             || targetType.isTop()
+          }
-             || targetType.isEquivalentTo(
+          if (foundType.isSomeUnknownType()
-                 registry.getNativeType(JSTypeNative.OBJECT_TYPE))) {
+             || foundType.isTypeVariable()
+             || foundType.isBottom()
+             || foundType.isTop()
+             || foundType.isEquivalentTo(registry.getNativeType(JSTypeNative.OBJECT_TYPE))) {
             if (reportLooseTypeViolations) {
               return ConformanceResult.POSSIBLE_VIOLATION_DUE_TO_LOOSE_TYPES;
             }
-          } else if (targetType.isSubtypeOf(methodClassType)) {
+          } else if (foundType.isSubtypeOf(typeWithBannedProp)) {
             return ConformanceResult.VIOLATION;
-          } else if (methodClassType.isSubtypeOf(targetType)) {
+          } else if (typeWithBannedProp.isSubtypeOf(foundType)) {
-            if (matchesPrototype(methodClassType, targetType)) {
+            if (matchesPrototype(typeWithBannedProp, foundType)) {
               return ConformanceResult.VIOLATION;
             } else if (reportLooseTypeViolations) {
               // Access of a banned property through a super class may be a violation

diff --git a/test/com/google/javascript/jscomp/CheckConformanceTest.java b/test/com/google/javascript/jscomp/CheckConformanceTest.java
@@ -622,6 +622,17 @@ public void testBannedProperty4() {
         CheckConformance.CONFORMANCE_POSSIBLE_VIOLATION);
   }
 
+  public void testBannedProperty5() {
+    configuration = LINE_JOINER.join(
+        "requirement: {",
+        "  type: BANNED_PROPERTY",
+        "  value: 'Array.prototype.push'",
+        "  error_message: 'banned Array.prototype.push'",
+        "}");
+
+    testConformance("[1, 2, 3].push(4);\n", CheckConformance.CONFORMANCE_VIOLATION);
+  }
+
   public void testBannedPropertyWrite() {
     configuration =
         "requirement: {\n" +