Suggest using code as per[]

PiperOrigin-RevId: 551547582

docs/bugpattern/javadoc/InvalidBlockTag.md

@@ -18,19 +18,31 @@ int twoTimes(int n) {
 }
 ```
 
-Note that any Javadoc line starting with `@`, even embedded inside `<pre>` and
-`{@code ...}`, is interpereted as a block tag by the Javadoc parser. As such, if
-you wish your Javadoc to include a code block containing an annotation, you
-should generally avoid `{@code ...}` and instead write the HTML yourself,
-manually escaping the `@` entity.
+Note that any Javadoc line starting with `@`, even embedded inside `<pre>` is
+interpreted as a block tag by the Javadoc parser. As such, if you wish your
+Javadoc to include a code block containing an annotation, you should surround
+the snippet with `{@code ...}`. Alternatively, and if you are using a version of
+javadoc prior to JDK 15, you may escape the symbol using `{@literal @}`
+
+```java
+/**
+ * Designed to be overridden, such as:
+ *
+ * <pre>{@code
+ * class Foo {
+ *   @Override public String toString() {return "";}
+ * }
+ * }</pre>
+ */
+```
 
 ```java
 /**
  * Designed to be overridden, such as:
  *
  * <pre>
  * class Foo {
- *   &#64;Override public String toString() {return "";}
+ *   {@literal @}Override public String toString() {return "";}
  * }
  * </pre>
  */