Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Iosevka #4728

Open
6 of 9 tasks
pinpox opened this issue May 29, 2022 · 5 comments
Open
6 of 9 tasks

Add Iosevka #4728

pinpox opened this issue May 29, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
-- Needs Upstream Resolution Upstream fix required before moving forward I New Font II Submission pending proposal for non-commissioned fonts suggested in the issue tracker

Comments

@pinpox
Copy link

pinpox commented May 29, 2022

Font Project Git Repo URL: https://github.com/be5invis/Iosevka

Super short description of the Font Family: Versatile typeface for code, from code.

Requirements:

I understand that Google Fonts will publish only fonts that matches its requirements, and I can confirm the project meets them (by ticking the cases, or putting x between the square brackets in text mode):

  • The entire font project is licensed under the OFL
  • There is no "Reserved Font Name" mention in the OFL license
  • Family name is unique according to namecheck.fontdata.com
  • The font supports at least GF Latin Core glyphset
  • The repository respect the upstream repo structure
  • The source files are available in the repository
  • I read, agree and comply with the full contributing requirements
  • I am the author of the font or the author agreed to this submission
  • I will maintain the repository

Image:

Attach here a pic or a screenshot of the font; one is enough, it can be few letters, to give a quick overview.

image

@pinpox pinpox added I New Font II Submission pending proposal for non-commissioned fonts suggested in the issue tracker labels May 29, 2022
@pinpox pinpox mentioned this issue May 29, 2022
@pvinis
Copy link

pvinis commented May 29, 2022

lets tag @be5invis too here

haunt98 added a commit to haunt98/posts-go that referenced this issue Sep 27, 2022
@RosaWagner
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the submission. We'll try to review it and will get back to you if it is accepted.

Some settings are not compliant with GF requirements, which I invite you to read more about here: https://googlefonts.github.io/gf-guide/

Making the font GF-friendly would imply important metadata change, so if the author actually wants to collaborate, may he make himself known in this thread. Otherwise we won't be able to make it happen.

@RosaWagner RosaWagner added the -- Needs Upstream Resolution Upstream fix required before moving forward label Sep 29, 2022
@RosaWagner RosaWagner added this to the Submissions to review milestone Sep 29, 2022
haunt98 added a commit to haunt98/iosevka_webfont that referenced this issue Oct 1, 2022
Self host iosevka webfont for now
See google/fonts#4728
haunt98 added a commit to haunt98/posts-go that referenced this issue Oct 1, 2022
@pvinis
Copy link

pvinis commented Oct 17, 2022

wow theres a lot of musts there. I wonder if it makes more sense @be5invis to make another repo that is just for google fonts, and it justs hosts the files in the right form, so not many changes have to happen on the main repo of iosevka.

@Diablo-D3
Copy link

@RosaWagner Can you explain to me the exact things Iosevka does not comply with? The document linked above is lengthy and doesn't really provide a clear-cut actionable plan.

@pvinis
Copy link

pvinis commented Oct 17, 2022

@Diablo-D3 come on, lets not make it harder. the link is pretty clear. there are some musts there. just open a couple of them and you'll see that the iosevka repo is not in line with. (which is totally fine btw, and that's why I suggested we make a separate repo for conforming to google fonts requirements.)

take this as an example, https://googlefonts.github.io/gf-guide/upstream.html#the-essentials-explained. the repo needs to have this "layout", and its not. that would be the first this I fix.

@RosaWagner RosaWagner removed this from the Submissions to review milestone Nov 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-- Needs Upstream Resolution Upstream fix required before moving forward I New Font II Submission pending proposal for non-commissioned fonts suggested in the issue tracker
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants