Lora v3.001 (stat fix) #3641
Merged
Lora v3.001 (stat fix) #3641
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fontbakery reportFontbakery version: 0.8.0 [2] Family checks🔥 FAIL: Each font in a family must have the same set of vertical metrics values.--- Rationale --- We want all fonts within a family to have the same vertical metrics so their line spacing is consistent across the family.
⚠ WARN: Is the command `ftxvalidator` (Apple Font Tool Suite) available?--- Rationale --- There's no reasonable (and legal) way to run the command `ftxvalidator` of the Apple Font Tool Suite on a non-macOS machine. I.e. on GNU+Linux or Windows etc. If Font Bakery is not running on an OSX machine, the machine running Font Bakery could access `ftxvalidator` on OSX, e.g. via ssh or a remote procedure call (rpc). There's an ssh example implementation at: https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/blob/main/prebuilt/workarounds /ftxvalidator/ssh-implementation/ftxvalidator
[11] Lora-Italic[wght].ttf🔥 FAIL: Is this a proper HTML snippet?--- Rationale --- Sometimes people write malformed HTML markup. This check should ensure the file is good. Additionally, when packaging families for being pushed to the `google/fonts` git repo, if there is no DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file, some older versions of the `add_font.py` tool insert a dummy description file which contains invalid html. This file needs to either be replaced with an existing description file or edited by hand.
Opening and ending tag mismatch: p line 1 and html, line 6, column 8 (, line 6)[code: malformed-snippet] 🔥 FAIL: Name table strings must not contain the string 'Reserved Font Name'.--- Rationale --- Some designers adopt the "Reserved Font Name" clause of the OFL license. This means that the original author reserves the rights to the family name and other people can only distribute modified versions using a different family name. Google Fonts published updates to the fonts in the collection in order to fix issues and/or implement further improvements to the fonts. It is important to keep the family name so that users of the webfonts can benefit from the updates. Since it would forbid such usage scenario, all families in the GFonts collection are required to not adopt the RFN clause. This check ensures "Reserved Font Name" is not mentioned in the name table.
🔥 FAIL: Ensure METADATA.pb does not use escaped strings.--- Rationale --- In some cases we've seen designer names and other fields with escaped strings in METADATA files. Nowadays the strings can be full unicode strings and do not need escaping.
🔥 FAIL: Ensure variable fonts include an avar table.--- Rationale --- Most variable fonts should include an avar table to correctly define axes progression rates. For example, a weight axis from 0% to 100% doesn't map directly to 100 to 1000, because a 10% progression from 0% may be too much to define the 200, while 90% may be too little to define the 900. If the progression rates of axes is linear, this check can be ignored. Fontmake will also skip adding an avar table if the progression rates are linear. However, we still recommend designers visually proof each instance is at the desired weight, width etc.
⚠ WARN: Check copyright namerecords match license file.--- Rationale --- A known licensing description must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table. The source of truth for this check (to determine which license is in use) is a file placed side-by-side to your font project including the licensing terms. Depending on the chosen license, one of the following string snippets is expected to be found on the NameID 13 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: License URL matches License text on name table?--- Rationale --- A known license URL must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE INFO URL) entry of the name table. The source of truth for this check is the licensing text found on the NameID 13 entry (LICENSE DESCRIPTION). The string snippets used for detecting licensing terms are: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: Copyright notice on METADATA.pb should not contain 'Reserved Font Name'.
⚠ WARN: Are there caret positions declared for every ligature?--- Rationale --- All ligatures in a font must have corresponding caret (text cursor) positions defined in the GDEF table, otherwhise, users may experience issues with caret rendering. If using GlyphsApp or UFOs, ligature carets can be defined as anchors with names starting with 'caret_'. These can be compiled with fontmake as of version v2.4.0.
⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?--- Rationale --- Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).
⚠ WARN: On a family update, the DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file should ideally also be updated.--- Rationale --- We want to ensure that any significant changes to the font family are properly mentioned in the DESCRIPTION file. In general, it means that the contents of the DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file will typically change if when font files are updated. Please treat this check as a reminder to do so whenever appropriate!
⚠ WARN: Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table.--- Rationale --- The OpenType 'meta' table originated at Apple. Microsoft added it to OT with just two DataMap records: - dlng: comma-separated ScriptLangTags that indicate which scripts, or languages and scripts, with possible variants, the font is designed for - slng: comma-separated ScriptLangTags that indicate which scripts, or languages and scripts, with possible variants, the font supports The slng structure is intended to describe which languages and scripts the font overall supports. For example, a Traditional Chinese font that also contains Latin characters, can indicate Hant,Latn, showing that it supports Hant, the Traditional Chinese variant of the Hani script, and it also supports the Latn script The dlng structure is far more interesting. A font may contain various glyphs, but only a particular subset of the glyphs may be truly "leading" in the design, while other glyphs may have been included for technical reasons. Such a Traditional Chinese font could only list Hant there, showing that it’s designed for Traditional Chinese, but the font would omit Latn, because the developers don’t think the font is really recommended for purely Latin-script use. The tags used in the structures can comprise just script, or also language and script. For example, if a font has Bulgarian Cyrillic alternates in the locl feature for the cyrl BGR OT languagesystem, it could also indicate in dlng explicitly that it supports bul-Cyrl. (Note that the scripts and languages in meta use the ISO language and script codes, not the OpenType ones). This check ensures that the font has the meta table containing the slng and dlng structures. All families in the Google Fonts collection should contain the 'meta' table. Windows 10 already uses it when deciding on which fonts to fall back to. The Google Fonts API and also other environments could use the data for smarter filtering. Most importantly, those entries should be added to the Noto fonts. In the font making process, some environments store this data in external files already. But the meta table provides a convenient way to store this inside the font file, so some tools may add the data, and unrelated tools may read this data. This makes the solution much more portable and universal.
[10] Lora[wght].ttf🔥 FAIL: Is this a proper HTML snippet?--- Rationale --- Sometimes people write malformed HTML markup. This check should ensure the file is good. Additionally, when packaging families for being pushed to the `google/fonts` git repo, if there is no DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file, some older versions of the `add_font.py` tool insert a dummy description file which contains invalid html. This file needs to either be replaced with an existing description file or edited by hand.
Opening and ending tag mismatch: p line 1 and html, line 6, column 8 (, line 6)[code: malformed-snippet] 🔥 FAIL: Name table strings must not contain the string 'Reserved Font Name'.--- Rationale --- Some designers adopt the "Reserved Font Name" clause of the OFL license. This means that the original author reserves the rights to the family name and other people can only distribute modified versions using a different family name. Google Fonts published updates to the fonts in the collection in order to fix issues and/or implement further improvements to the fonts. It is important to keep the family name so that users of the webfonts can benefit from the updates. Since it would forbid such usage scenario, all families in the GFonts collection are required to not adopt the RFN clause. This check ensures "Reserved Font Name" is not mentioned in the name table.
🔥 FAIL: Ensure METADATA.pb does not use escaped strings.--- Rationale --- In some cases we've seen designer names and other fields with escaped strings in METADATA files. Nowadays the strings can be full unicode strings and do not need escaping.
🔥 FAIL: Ensure variable fonts include an avar table.--- Rationale --- Most variable fonts should include an avar table to correctly define axes progression rates. For example, a weight axis from 0% to 100% doesn't map directly to 100 to 1000, because a 10% progression from 0% may be too much to define the 200, while 90% may be too little to define the 900. If the progression rates of axes is linear, this check can be ignored. Fontmake will also skip adding an avar table if the progression rates are linear. However, we still recommend designers visually proof each instance is at the desired weight, width etc.
⚠ WARN: Check copyright namerecords match license file.--- Rationale --- A known licensing description must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table. The source of truth for this check (to determine which license is in use) is a file placed side-by-side to your font project including the licensing terms. Depending on the chosen license, one of the following string snippets is expected to be found on the NameID 13 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: License URL matches License text on name table?--- Rationale --- A known license URL must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE INFO URL) entry of the name table. The source of truth for this check is the licensing text found on the NameID 13 entry (LICENSE DESCRIPTION). The string snippets used for detecting licensing terms are: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: Copyright notice on METADATA.pb should not contain 'Reserved Font Name'.
⚠ WARN: Are there caret positions declared for every ligature?--- Rationale --- All ligatures in a font must have corresponding caret (text cursor) positions defined in the GDEF table, otherwhise, users may experience issues with caret rendering. If using GlyphsApp or UFOs, ligature carets can be defined as anchors with names starting with 'caret_'. These can be compiled with fontmake as of version v2.4.0.
⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?--- Rationale --- Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).
⚠ WARN: Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table.--- Rationale --- The OpenType 'meta' table originated at Apple. Microsoft added it to OT with just two DataMap records: - dlng: comma-separated ScriptLangTags that indicate which scripts, or languages and scripts, with possible variants, the font is designed for - slng: comma-separated ScriptLangTags that indicate which scripts, or languages and scripts, with possible variants, the font supports The slng structure is intended to describe which languages and scripts the font overall supports. For example, a Traditional Chinese font that also contains Latin characters, can indicate Hant,Latn, showing that it supports Hant, the Traditional Chinese variant of the Hani script, and it also supports the Latn script The dlng structure is far more interesting. A font may contain various glyphs, but only a particular subset of the glyphs may be truly "leading" in the design, while other glyphs may have been included for technical reasons. Such a Traditional Chinese font could only list Hant there, showing that it’s designed for Traditional Chinese, but the font would omit Latn, because the developers don’t think the font is really recommended for purely Latin-script use. The tags used in the structures can comprise just script, or also language and script. For example, if a font has Bulgarian Cyrillic alternates in the locl feature for the cyrl BGR OT languagesystem, it could also indicate in dlng explicitly that it supports bul-Cyrl. (Note that the scripts and languages in meta use the ISO language and script codes, not the OpenType ones). This check ensures that the font has the meta table containing the slng and dlng structures. All families in the Google Fonts collection should contain the 'meta' table. Windows 10 already uses it when deciding on which fonts to fall back to. The Google Fonts API and also other environments could use the data for smarter filtering. Most importantly, those entries should be added to the Noto fonts. In the font making process, some environments store this data in external files already. But the meta table provides a convenient way to store this inside the font file, so some tools may add the data, and unrelated tools may read this data. This makes the solution much more portable and universal.
Summary
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:
|
|
The Light |
This was referenced Aug 4, 2021
|
Probably because there shouldn't be a Light in that font :). Thanks for the catch. |
|
Found that Ҧҧ were missing from the new sources (they were lost from the old UFOs), readded. Also aligned typoAscender between Regular and Italic as they were out of sync—I aligned to the Regular. Updated metadata. There's a number of diffs related to diacritics. Prior, the non-combining marks were being classified as marks—not any more. Additionally, many base glyphs do not have anchors, causing a lot of overlaps now with combining marks. As the font is further updated I'd expect these to be resolved. Anyway, I think GTG. |
|
Mark placement looks better except for A caps
|
|
@RosaWagner If you look at the report, the change is actually related to the diacritics themselves, not the cap A. And in this case, it is the non-combining marks (such as I expect this change is due to a newer version of fontmake, and I'm not concerned about it :). |
|
Happy to hear, then LGTM |
RosaWagner
added
--- to_production
I Small Fix
RosaWagner
added
I Small Fix
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Font repro updated to the UFR format (https://github.com/aaronbell/Lora-Cyrillic).
PR'd to upstream.
Font files rebuilt.