Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add remote to sentry device numbers mapping in gofer client. #7801

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link

@copybara-service copybara-service bot commented Jul 12, 2022

Add remote to sentry device numbers mapping in gofer client.

This enables the gofer client to use the remote inode numbers
directly, without having to impose the requirement for getdents
RPC to also return device numbers for all entries. This reduces
the work required of the getdents RPC to O(1) syscalls, instead
of O(N).

@copybara-service copybara-service bot added the exported Issue was exported automatically label Jul 12, 2022
@copybara-service copybara-service bot force-pushed the test/cl460550395 branch 3 times, most recently from 33f6813 to f218c94 Compare July 13, 2022 20:05
@copybara-service copybara-service bot changed the title Add remote to sentry-synthetic device numbers mapping in gofer client. Add remote to sentry-remote device numbers mapping in gofer client. Jul 15, 2022
This enables the gofer client to use the remote inode numbers
directly, without having to impose the requirement for getdents
RPC to also return device numbers for all entries. This reduces
the work required of the getdents RPC to O(1) syscalls, instead
of O(N).

PiperOrigin-RevId: 460550395
@copybara-service copybara-service bot changed the title Add remote to sentry-remote device numbers mapping in gofer client. Add remote to sentry device numbers mapping in gofer client. Jun 13, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

A friendly reminder that this PR had no activity for 120 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale-pr This PR has not been updated in 120 days. label Oct 12, 2023
Copy link

This PR has been closed due to lack of activity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
auto-closed exported Issue was exported automatically stale-pr This PR has not been updated in 120 days.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant