[fuzzing-puzzles] Enable AFL fuzzing engine instead of libFuzzer + re… #1495
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…name the target to prevent corpus re-use.
Dor1s
commented
Jun 7, 2018
| @@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ sanitizers: | |||
| - undefined | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jonathanmetzman do you think it's going to work fine, or should I change to ASan?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think UBSan will work at all with AFL
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for checking, using ASan then.
|
AFL made it through 112 constraints so far. |
tmatth
pushed a commit
to tmatth/oss-fuzz
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2018
google#1495) * [fuzzing-puzzles] Enable AFL fuzzing engine instead of libFuzzer + rename the target to prevent corpus re-use. * Use ASan instead of UBSan.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…name the target to prevent corpus re-use.
from #1485 (comment)