Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make sure async-functions work without generators. #1235

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2014

Conversation

arv
Copy link
Collaborator

@arv arv commented Aug 4, 2014

This was due to a typo.

Fixes #1231

@arv
Copy link
Collaborator Author

arv commented Aug 4, 2014

@johnjbarton

@johnjbarton
Copy link
Contributor

lgtm I wonder if we should support this combination, given that we aren't really covering it in tests. That is we could simply require generators=true whenever asyncFunctions.

@arv
Copy link
Collaborator Author

arv commented Aug 4, 2014

We should support this combination. async-functions and generators are orthogonal.

@arv arv merged commit 83d19c8 into google:master Aug 4, 2014
@arv arv deleted the async-without-generators branch August 4, 2014 21:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

asyncFunctions transformation does not work with generators: 'parse'
2 participants