Host a version of the "hello world"

[PaulKinlan]

We should host a version of the hello world so that people can play with it without downloading it.

Note: we probably can't do this on gh-pages under the google org.

[addyosmani]

If it's possible to find a way to get a directory or repo setup for the WSK landing page on GitHub, it would make it super easy to keep that up to date and pushed to the site too. Is that possible?

[jbnicolai]

A possible solution is creating a dedicated org for WSK and using the orgs homepage, having github host the site under web-starter-kit.github.io.

Using a gulp port of https://github.com/robwierzbowski/grunt-build-control you could then automate the publishing process.

[PaulKinlan]

@jbnicolai as an org would be brilliant, I don't think our OSS team will let us do that.... Let me fire off an email to the team and see what we hear back.

[PaulKinlan]

@addyosmani I just created the org... just in case.

[jbnicolai]

@PaulKinlan 👍

[jbnicolai]

Alternatively, you could consider using TravisCI to automatically deploy to Heroku. Might have the nice side effect of also running the Gulp linting steps on each push, verifying each pull request.

[addyosmani]

@PaulKinlan Cheers for setting that up. I would personally prefer not creating a new org for the project (at least for now). It took a long time to get approved for living on this org and I'm okay with us continuing here :)

We could (without too much effort) get a git hook in place to help us push to appengine or Heroku.

[PaulKinlan]

I am cool with an appengine deploy and I can set it up pretty quickly with our deploy process

[addyosmani]

That would be fantastic <3

[sindresorhus]

Note: we probably can't do this on gh-pages under the google org.

It's not clear why this is not possible?

[PaulKinlan]

@sindresorhus because the org is not set up for it and we don't control it.

[PaulKinlan]

@addyosmani I am on it now. It should be pretty simple.

[sindresorhus]

I might be missing something, but why not just create a gh-pages branch and use the http://google.github.io/web-starter-kit url. Nothing required by the org.

[PaulKinlan]

I know it is technically possible, I believe the org doesn't want this and
we don't do it for any other project.

On 21 June 2014 11:32, Sindre Sorhus notifications@github.com wrote:

I might be missing something, but why not just create a gh-pages branch
and use the http://google.github.io/web-starter-kit url. Nothing required
by the org.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#136 (comment)
.

[sindresorhus]

k, cool :)

[PaulKinlan]

http://google.github.io/rekall/

On 21 June 2014 11:34, Sindre Sorhus notifications@github.com wrote:

k, cool :)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#136 (comment)
.

[PaulKinlan]

It would be 10x easier just to do gh-pages....

On 21 June 2014 11:34, Paul Kinlan paul.kinlan@gmail.com wrote:

http://google.github.io/rekall/

On 21 June 2014 11:34, Sindre Sorhus notifications@github.com wrote:

k, cool :)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#136 (comment)
.

[addyosmani]

Hmm. If those guys do it then surely there is precedent.

[PaulKinlan]

Exactly.

On 21 June 2014 12:19, Addy Osmani notifications@github.com wrote:

Hmm. If those guys do it then surely there is precedent.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#136 (comment)
.

[12311992]

Hihi I'm mark. Dont question mark

[saifanam]

Looking forward to the Hello World demo @PaulKinlan 👍 App Engine's going to be cool. It does take a while to set things up with all the stuff like Node, Ruby etc.

[jbnicolai]

Looks like the traceur-compiler is also using gh-pages, so it seems there's plenty of precedent 😄

[PaulKinlan]

As a side note, this feels like a duplicate of #97

[battaglr]

👍 Would be great!