Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Put the byteorder module behind a feature flag #162

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2023
Merged

Conversation

joshlf
Copy link
Member

@joshlf joshlf commented Mar 3, 2023

The feature is on by default, but allows consumers to avoid the dependency on the byteorder crate if they wish.

@joshlf joshlf requested a review from djkoloski March 3, 2023 18:54
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the byteorder-feature branch 3 times, most recently from 7edabff to 185204f Compare March 3, 2023 19:07
The feature is on by default, but allows consumers to avoid the
dependency on the `byteorder` crate if they wish.

Release 0.7.0-alpha.3 so that users who vendor zerocopy can make use of
this feature.
@joshlf joshlf merged commit 0fbc928 into main Mar 3, 2023
@joshlf joshlf deleted the byteorder-feature branch March 3, 2023 20:12
joshlf added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2023
The feature is on by default, but allows consumers to avoid the
dependency on the `byteorder` crate if they wish.
joshlf added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2023
The feature is on by default, but allows consumers to avoid the
dependency on the `byteorder` crate if they wish.
joshlf added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2023
The feature is on by default, but allows consumers to avoid the
dependency on the `byteorder` crate if they wish.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants