Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: optional-to-required field for Cloud DMS #649

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

bshaffer
Copy link
Contributor

@bshaffer bshaffer commented Sep 5, 2023

Fix BC-breaking changes in googleapis/google-cloud-php#6607

Also organizes array values alphabetically for readability

@bshaffer bshaffer requested review from a team as code owners September 5, 2023 17:40
@bshaffer bshaffer changed the title optional-to-required fix for Cloud DMS fix: optional-to-required field for Cloud DMS Sep 5, 2023
@conventional-commit-lint-gcf
Copy link

conventional-commit-lint-gcf bot commented Sep 5, 2023

🤖 I detect that the PR title and the commit message differ and there's only one commit. To use the PR title for the commit history, you can use Github's automerge feature with squashing, or use automerge label. Good luck human!

-- conventional-commit-lint bot
https://conventionalcommits.org/

@@ -138,15 +138,16 @@ class FieldDetails
* AFTER a package's 1.0 release, back to being optional.
*/
private static $optionalToRequiredFixes = [
'google.logging.v2.UpdateCmekSettingsRequest' => ['name', 'cmek_settings'],
'google.logging.v2.GetCmekSettingsRequest' => ['name'],
'google.cloud.clouddms.v1.DescribeDatabaseEntitiesRequest' => ['tree'],
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the tree part and where is it used?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know anything about it other than it's a property that used to be optional and now it's required.

Copy link
Contributor

@vishwarajanand vishwarajanand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving to unblock, but left a Q for my understanding.

@bshaffer bshaffer merged commit 613baec into main Sep 7, 2023
5 checks passed
@bshaffer bshaffer deleted the bshaffer-patch-1 branch September 7, 2023 20:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants