Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove TableInfo hierarchy, add TableType hierarchy #600

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 2, 2016

Conversation

mziccard
Copy link
Contributor

This PR removes TableInfo hierarchy and replaces it with a hierarchy on TableType. This change is needed to make functional Table extend TableInfo. Notes:

  • A type object (DefaultTableType, ExternalTableType or ViewType) must be provided to create a JobInfo object.
  • ExternalDataConfiguration has been removed in favore of ExternalTableType which is also used for defining external table sources in QueryJobConfiguration.

@mziccard mziccard added the api: bigquery Issues related to the BigQuery API. label Jan 29, 2016
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Jan 29, 2016
@@ -298,7 +305,7 @@ public boolean equals(Object obj) {
* of 10 GB maximum size across all URIs.
* @param schema the schema for the external data
* @param format the source format of the external data
* @return a builder for an ExternalDataConfiguration object given source URIs, schema and format
* @return a builder for an ExternalTableDefinition object given source URIs, schema and format

This comment was marked as spam.

@ajkannan
Copy link

2 BigQuery lint errors unrelated to this PR:

gcloud-java-bigquery/src/test/java/com/google/gcloud/bigquery/WriteChannelConfigurationTest.java:50: error: Line is longer than 100 characters (found 113).
gcloud-java-bigquery/src/test/java/com/google/gcloud/bigquery/WriteChannelConfigurationTest.java:109: error: Line is longer than 100 characters (found 110).

assertTrue(bigquery.delete(DATASET, tableName));
}

@Test
public void testUpdateNonExistingTable() {
TableInfo tableInfo =
TableInfo.of(TableId.of(DATASET, "test_update_non_existing_table"), SIMPLE_SCHEMA);

This comment was marked as spam.

@ajkannan
Copy link

Took a first pass, looks good! Just some minor comments from me.

@mziccard
Copy link
Contributor Author

mziccard commented Feb 1, 2016

Thanks for the pass @ajkannan I addressed all comments in 931b4d3

@mziccard mziccard force-pushed the bigquery-hierachies branch 2 times, most recently from 3474f3b to 04fbf41 Compare February 1, 2016 14:17
@ajkannan
Copy link

ajkannan commented Feb 1, 2016

Looks good, just one new lint error:
gcloud-java-bigquery/src/test/java/com/google/gcloud/bigquery/ViewDefinitionTest.java:65: error: Line is longer than 100 characters (found 111).

Aside from this PR, I think it'd be cool if we figured out some way to link the snippets in the READMEs to code we could test in Travis (something like the snippets here: https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/java/gettingstarted/ui_and_code). That way we'd always know our snippets are up to date after changes. But in lieu of that for now, it'd be good to test that the snippets work when this is about to get merged in, or when the info and functional objects get merged (if that's going to happen sooner rather than later).

public enum Type {
/**
* A normal BigQuery table. Instances of {@code BaseTableDefinition} for this type are
* implemented by {@link DefaultTableDefinition}.

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

@mziccard
Copy link
Contributor Author

mziccard commented Feb 1, 2016

Looks good, just one new lint error:

fixed

Aside from this PR, I think it'd be cool if we figured out some way to link the snippets in the READMEs to code we could test in Travis (something like the snippets here: https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/java/gettingstarted/ui_and_code). That way we'd always know our snippets are up to date after changes. But in lieu of that for now, it'd be good to test that the snippets work when this is about to get merged in, or when the info and functional objects get merged (if that's going to happen sooner rather than later).

I totally agree but this is not easy to do. Snippets that we have now are simple end-to-end usage showcases (e.g. update a blob if it exists or create it if not). On the other hand our examples are more complex and command-line oriented to show the usage of each single functionality. Snippets could be part of IT tests but they will need changes anyway: asserts, data definitions, etc.

What we could do is creating a snippet (and possibly name of the service?) package in gcloud-java-examples where we put each snippet as a class+main with a meaningful name (e.g. CreateOrUpdateBlob). We can then reference those files before the snippet as in the example you provided. What do you think? (I think this deserves a dedicated issue).

@mziccard
Copy link
Contributor Author

mziccard commented Feb 1, 2016

Renamed to TableDefinition in 085903a

* used to specify only the fields of interest. {@link BaseTableInfo#tableId()} and
* {@link BaseTableInfo#type()} are always returned, even if not specified.
* used to specify only the fields of interest. {@link TableInfo#tableId()} and
* {@link TableInfo#definition()} are always returned, even if not specified.

This comment was marked as spam.


@Override
public String toString() {
return MoreObjects.toStringHelper(this)

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

@aozarov
Copy link
Contributor

aozarov commented Feb 1, 2016

Looks great. Few minor comments/suggestions.

aozarov added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2016
Remove TableInfo hierarchy, add TableType hierarchy
@aozarov aozarov merged commit 2bb03eb into googleapis:master Feb 2, 2016
github-actions bot pushed a commit to suztomo/google-cloud-java that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2022
🤖 I have created a release \*beep\* \*boop\*
---
### Updating meta-information for bleeding-edge SNAPSHOT release.
---


This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2022
* chore(bazel): update protobuf to v3.21.7

PiperOrigin-RevId: 477955264

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@a724450

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis-gen@4abcbca
Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoiLmdpdGh1Yi8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiNGFiY2JjYWVjODU1ZTc0YTBiMjJhNDk4OGNmOWUwZWI2MWE4MzA5NCJ9

* 🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor

See https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/blob/main/packages/owl-bot/README.md

Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
suztomo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
* chore: fix auto-release

* chore: remove codecov.yml

* chore: update license headers for yaml files
Source-Link: googleapis/synthtool@5b77727
Post-Processor: gcr.io/cloud-devrel-public-resources/owlbot-java:latest@sha256:ebc2104854c5b81c6fd72ca79400a2e20e0d510c5e0654fd1a19e5c9be160ca6

Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: bigquery Issues related to the BigQuery API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants