Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add syntactic sugar for exact timestamp lookups #65

Closed
igorbernstein2 opened this issue Nov 5, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #92
Closed

Add syntactic sugar for exact timestamp lookups #65

igorbernstein2 opened this issue Nov 5, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #92
Assignees
@rahulKQL
Labels
api: bigtable Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigtable API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@igorbernstein2
Copy link
Contributor

FILTERS.timestamp().range().startClosed(x).endClosed(x) is a bit verbose
FILTERS.timestamp().exact(x) would be preferable
@igorbernstein2 igorbernstein2 added the type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. label Nov 5, 2019
@rahulKQL rahulKQL mentioned this issue Nov 18, 2019
Merged
@google-cloud-label-sync google-cloud-label-sync bot added the api: bigtable Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigtable API. label Jan 31, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rahulKQL rahulKQL

Labels
api: bigtable Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigtable API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Added FILTERS.timestamp().exact() for better access & read ability. rahulKQL/java-bigtable
2 participants
@igorbernstein2 @rahulKQL