Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow Protobuf arrays with unset values #105

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2018
Merged

Conversation

schmidt-sebastian
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like Firebase Functions sometimes send us an Array protobuf that is missing the values field altogether, which results in an undefined iterator error.

Fixes #103

@ghost ghost added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Jan 12, 2018
@schmidt-sebastian schmidt-sebastian changed the title Allowing unset Arrays Allow Protobuf arrays with unset values Jan 12, 2018
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #105 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #105   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files          12     12           
  Lines        1642   1644    +2     
=====================================
+ Hits         1642   1644    +2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/document.js 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/convert.js 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a986a6e...de5f048. Read the comment docs.

@schmidt-sebastian schmidt-sebastian merged commit 7a9c193 into master Jan 12, 2018
@ghost ghost removed the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Jan 12, 2018
@schmidt-sebastian schmidt-sebastian deleted the mrschmidt-arrays branch January 30, 2018 16:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants