Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: closing the subscription stream without clearing the local inventory and flushing ACKs #725

Closed
ide opened this issue Aug 26, 2019 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
api: pubsub Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-pubsub API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@ide
Copy link

ide commented Aug 26, 2019

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I am looking to gracefully shutdown a service (ex: during rolling deployments) by draining remaining Pub/Sub messages without accepting new ones. Currently, this library offers an async subscription.close() method, which (1) closes the subscription stream, (2) clears the inventory of locally buffered messages, and (3) waits to flush all ACKs/NACKs:

async close(): Promise<void> {
if (!this.isOpen) {
return;
}
this.isOpen = false;
this._stream.destroy();
this._inventory.clear();
await this._waitForFlush();
this.emit('close');

The issue with close() is that the local inventory (in the LeaseManager instance) is cleared, which means those messages won't get handled until their ack deadline expires and the Pub/Sub service redelivers the messages to a new subscriber.

Describe the solution you'd like

I would like to have an API to help with gracefully draining the Pub/Sub subscription. Here are two proposals:

  1. New method -- subscription.pause(): pauses the underlying pull stream so that it doesn't fetch new messages from the Pub/Sub service. The caller of this API can then pause the subscription, handle the remaining messages until the inventory is drained (perhaps expose another event to learn when the inventory is empty), and then call close() to flush all the ACKs.
  2. Make subscription.close() drain the inventory: calling close() would close the underlying pull stream, wait for the existing inventory to become empty instead of clearing it, and then wait for the ACKs to be flushed.

Describe alternatives you've considered
In the meantime, I have a separate leasing system that deduplicates messages across Pub/Sub subscriber instances. (This was necessary because Pub/Sub has at-least-once semantics.) I could reduce the ack deadline for messages to something short, and rely on the leasing system to guard against the higher likelihood of duplicate messages.

With the shorter ack deadline, calling close() will still cause messages in the orphaned inventory to wait until their ack deadlines expire, but the deadlines will be shorter, reducing the impact of this issue.

@bcoe bcoe added the type: question Request for information or clarification. Not an issue. label Aug 26, 2019
@callmehiphop callmehiphop added type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. and removed type: question Request for information or clarification. Not an issue. labels Aug 26, 2019
@callmehiphop
Copy link
Contributor

@ide thanks for the detailed write up! I think I would be in favor of adding an alternative method to close that would wait for all the messages to be acked/nacked before releasing the lock on them.

@kamalaboulhosn @bcoe any thoughts here?

@google-cloud-label-sync google-cloud-label-sync bot added the api: pubsub Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-pubsub API. label Jan 30, 2020
@meredithslota
Copy link
Contributor

(Just shifting assignee, will leave to @feywind to determine path forward.)

@feywind
Copy link
Collaborator

feywind commented May 5, 2020

I'd like to take a further look at this after we've got 2.x out the door.

@feywind
Copy link
Collaborator

feywind commented Aug 18, 2020

Just bumping this as still in the queue.

@michaelwittig
Copy link

I was looking for the same problem today.

Our workaround for now is this:

this.subscription = this.topic.subscription(PUBSUB_SUBSCRIPTION_NAME, {
      flowControl: { maxMessages: 10 }, // tradeoff performance against number of "stuck" messages during deployments
    });

Helps us a bit to keep the number of locally queued messages low but it also says that pubsub might just ignore that value. So... :)

@feywind
Copy link
Collaborator

feywind commented Mar 24, 2022

Moving this into our internal backlog, but feel free to keep adding comments if needed here.

@kaushlakers
Copy link

Any update on this? Is there any way to gracefully drain a subscription in the library now? Either of the solutions proposed here would be great.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: pubsub Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-pubsub API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants