New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Fixed object paths in autogenerated code in owlbot.py #804
Changes from 2 commits
2ea5991
c201482
4700f8a
0dddf60
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -36,10 +36,10 @@ | |
|
||
async def sample_copy_log_entries(): | ||
# Create a client | ||
client = logging_v2.ConfigServiceV2AsyncClient() | ||
client = logging_v2.services.config_service_v2.ConfigServiceV2AsyncClient() | ||
|
||
# Initialize request argument(s) | ||
request = logging_v2.CopyLogEntriesRequest( | ||
request = logging_v2.types.CopyLogEntriesRequest( | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. One thought: these generated samples aren't covered by tests. Have you considered adding tests for these to catch this kind of issue in the future, like the other snippets? Smoke tests could be helpful here (i.e. just executing each function and making sure nothing crashes) There may be a simple way to programmatically load and execute each sample, but if it's bit more complicated we could open a bug for later |
||
name="name_value", | ||
destination="destination_value", | ||
) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we discussed the possibility of eventually restructuring the gapic/veneer files into different folders, which should remove the need for this fix, right?
It might be a good idea to open a bug for that and add a link to the comment here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Depending on how the gapic/veneer files are structured we might need to have a different fix for replacing
logging_v2
with something likelogging_v2.gapic
, but yeah we wouldn't need a dictionary structure like it is now.