test: increasing timeout in testOnResponseError #2291
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This test is multithread because RetryingServerStreamingCallable uses an executor. This change increases the timeout in HttpJsonDirectServerStreamingCallableTest.testOnResponseError to avoid flakiness. There's no guarantee that this multithread test executes the CountDownLatch.countDown() within 2 seconds.
|
[gapic-generator-java-root] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
|
[java_showcase_integration_tests] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
lqiu96
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2023
This was referenced Dec 14, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #1675
(This test is multithread because RetryingServerStreamingCallable uses an executor.)
This change increases the timeout in HttpJsonDirectServerStreamingCallableTest.testOnResponseError to avoid flakiness. There's no guarantee that this multithread test executes the CountDownLatch.countDown() within 2 seconds.
Will this 60-second timeout make the test execution slower? => No, it won't.
CountDownLatch.await(timeout)returns immediately when the count becomes zero, without waiting for timeout.In b/281936326, Lawrence tried to reproduce the issue in Windows, but it didn't. I think the best way is to increase timeout and observe any recurrence.