Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Filter idea: QUIC based filter #9

Closed
markmandel opened this issue Jan 28, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Filter idea: QUIC based filter #9

markmandel opened this issue Jan 28, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
area/user-experience Pertaining to developers trying to use Quilkin, e.g. cli interface, configuration, etc kind/design Proposal discussing new features / fixes and how they should be implemented kind/feature New feature or request priority/wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@markmandel
Copy link
Member

(Mostly placeholder for further investigation)

Secure UDP communcation provided on both the sender and receiver side, using QUIC for packet sending and receiving (but not the HTTP aspects).

https://github.com/cloudflare/quiche looks promising.

There are concerns about QUIC having it's own reliable UDP implementation, which is not something we want. We should investigate and see if that in quiche / can we turn it off / other options.
@markmandel markmandel added kind/feature New feature or request area/user-experience Pertaining to developers trying to use Quilkin, e.g. cli interface, configuration, etc kind/design Proposal discussing new features / fixes and how they should be implemented labels Jan 28, 2020
@markmandel
Copy link
Member Author

Interesting - https://github.com/djc/quinn/tree/master/quinn is a quic implementation, that uses rusttls for crytpo, rather than quiche, which uses boringssl, and has to be compiled from C and linked 😬

@markmandel
Copy link
Member Author

Should we close this ticket? I think we have agreed this no longer makes sense?

@luna-duclos
Copy link
Collaborator

Should we close this ticket? I think we have agreed this no longer makes sense?

Indeed, I believe so

@markmandel markmandel added the priority/wontfix This will not be worked on label Aug 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/user-experience Pertaining to developers trying to use Quilkin, e.g. cli interface, configuration, etc kind/design Proposal discussing new features / fixes and how they should be implemented kind/feature New feature or request priority/wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@markmandel @luna-duclos