[TAG review] Should there be a higher granularity for selecting devices?

[kdashg]

From w3ctag/design-reviews#626 (comment)

Should there be a higher granularity for selecting devices? For example, for cases where one wants to select a high-VRAM device (e.g. for machine learning workloads) or the non-dominant (e.g. secondary device which hopefully will not jank the current compositor) device. Allowing a single application to be the dominant resource user is not new, but it is definitely something that want to be careful about.

[litherum]

Resolved today: this isn't necessary because almost all machines have either 1 or 2 devices which are already addressable by just the high-performance/low-power existing toggle.

[kainino0x]

We moved it to post-V1 instead of closing it because there's a possibility that devs will come to us with this requirement in the future. However, I think we should just close it, because there's not much discussion on this issue and I'm sure it would end up getting filed as a new one anyway. (Or we can reopen this when the time comes.)