Optional labels fe #1105
Merged
Optional labels fe #1105
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
abidlabs
reviewed
Apr 27, 2022
abidlabs
reviewed
Apr 27, 2022
|
This is great! |
abidlabs
approved these changes
Apr 27, 2022
Co-authored-by: Abubakar Abid <abubakar@huggingface.co>
Co-authored-by: Abubakar Abid <abubakar@huggingface.co>
pngwn
commented
Apr 27, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow up to #1080
Closes #946.
demo/blocks_outputsis a good one to check the label-less components but worth manually testing too.The
show_labeloption is respected for any component that has a label, not just forms.