We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
targetType
kind
The targetType annotation is unnecessarily wordy, as well as misleading. kind would be better:
Foo: string @cuetsy(kind="interface")
kind is maybe not entirely right either. But it at least makes it clear we're not talking about types, but a higher-order concept.
We can retain legacy support for targetType if we want. Not a big deal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ying-jeanne
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
The
targetType
annotation is unnecessarily wordy, as well as misleading.kind
would be better:kind
is maybe not entirely right either. But it at least makes it clear we're not talking about types, but a higher-order concept.We can retain legacy support for
targetType
if we want. Not a big deal.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: