-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 381
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
required csv fields #1096
required csv fields #1096
Conversation
operators.operatorframework.io/builder: operator-sdk-v1.22.2 | ||
operators.operatorframework.io/project_layout: go.kubebuilder.io/v3 | ||
repository: https://github.com/grafana-operator/grafana-operator | ||
support: Red Hat |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On this point, I've gotten RH internal messages asking whether this is officially a RH supported project.
Some customers are asking whether this is an officially supported operator for their deployment.
I've always given the answer "no". Since this operator is officially developed by a few RH employees, we say it is a RH project, however, there is no official support from RH.
Another issue, is that some customers have asked our RH consultants for changes to the operator to meet their requirements, as such, going through internal requests to try and get their feature request implemented.
I've always argued that this is not part of RH tracked work, and our engagement in this project, albeit as RH employees, is purely open source and not part of our assigned roles, as such, I've always referred such requests from RH customers to be directed through the community issues. Since we cannot guarantee that a customer request will be addressed in any time frame
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, I'm not sure whether we should continue advertising support as "Red Hat" or perhaps phrase it differently to be less "engaging" maybe "Red Hat - Open Source Community"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is updated now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it? I'm still seeing Red Hat 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry, looks like I pushed to the wrong location. This is fixed now.
Add the rest of the required CSV fields