Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cloud Monitoring: Support AliasBy property in MQL mode #73116

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 10, 2023

Conversation

alyssabull
Copy link
Contributor

@alyssabull alyssabull commented Aug 9, 2023

Adds support for AliasBy in Builder Mode and preserves AliasBy when switching between MQL and Builder mode.

Screenshot 2023-08-09 at 9 10 20 AM

Fixes grafana/support-escalations#7004

Copy link
Contributor

@aangelisc aangelisc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM! Great stuff, I'd add a test just to avoid a regression in future but nice work 😊

@aangelisc aangelisc changed the title Cloud Monitoring: Support AliasBy property in Builder mode Cloud Monitoring: Support AliasBy property in MQL mode Aug 9, 2023
@aangelisc
Copy link
Contributor

10/10! Great stuff @alyssabull 😊

Copy link
Contributor

@asimpson asimpson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nicely done 🚀

@alyssabull alyssabull merged commit eeefa7d into main Aug 10, 2023
15 checks passed
@alyssabull alyssabull deleted the alyssa/gcm-preserve-aliasby branch August 10, 2023 16:55
grafana-delivery-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2023
aangelisc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2023
)

Cloud Monitoring: Support AliasBy property in MQL mode (#73116)

(cherry picked from commit eeefa7d)

Co-authored-by: Alyssa Bull <58453566+alyssabull@users.noreply.github.com>
aishyandapalli pushed a commit to aishyandapalli/grafana that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2023
@zerok
Copy link
Contributor

zerok commented Aug 22, 2023

Hi :) Looks like this never made it into the v10.1.x branch. Is this only required for 10.0.x?

@aangelisc
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @zerok, thanks for picking this up. We should probably backport to v10.1.x as well just incase 😊

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants