Bug Fix: Respect data source version when provisioning #77428
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
andresmgot
requested review from
nikimanoledaki,
suntala and
yangkb09
and removed request for
a team
zserge
approved these changes
Nov 1, 2023
3 tasks
grafana-delivery-bot bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2023
(cherry picked from commit 82a7e12)
zserge
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is this feature?
According to the documentation, specifying a version when provisioning a data source would be used to compare with the existing version in the database. If the version provisioned is older, the data source should not be updated. Prior to this PR, the version specified in the provisioning file was being ignored.
Which issue(s) does this PR fix?:
Fixes #75722
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please check that: