Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors #79161
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible. I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected. There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting. Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries. Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
gotjosh
added
add to changelog
product-approved
3 tasks
Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
gotjosh
requested review from
rwwiv,
JacobsonMT,
yuri-tceretian and
grobinson-grafana
and removed request for
a team
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
grafana-delivery-bot
bot
added
the
backport-failed
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
3 tasks
grafana-delivery-bot bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2023
* Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible. I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected. There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting. Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries. --------- Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit c631261)
gotjosh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2023
* Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible. I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected. There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting. Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries. --------- Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit c631261)
3 tasks
gotjosh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2023
* Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible. I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected. There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting. Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries. --------- Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit c631261) Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
gotjosh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2023
Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors (#79161) * Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible. I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected. There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting. Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries. --------- (cherry picked from commit c631261) Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
gotjosh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2023
Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors (#79161) * Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible. I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected. There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting. Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries. --------- Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit c631261) Co-authored-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
gotjosh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2023
* Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible. I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected. There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting. Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries. --------- Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit c631261)
3 tasks
gotjosh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2023
* Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible. I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected. There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting. Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries. --------- Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit c631261) Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
gotjosh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2023
* Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible. I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected. There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting. Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries. --------- Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit c631261)
3 tasks
gotjosh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2023
* Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible. I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected. There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting. Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries. --------- Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit c631261)
3 tasks
gotjosh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2023
Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors (#79161) * Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible. I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected. There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting. Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries. --------- Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit c631261)
gotjosh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2023
Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors (#79161) * Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible. I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected. There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting. Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries. --------- (cherry picked from commit c631261) Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
gotjosh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2023
Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors (#79161) * Alerting: Attempt to retry retryable errors Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible. I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected. There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting. Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries. --------- Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit c631261)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Retrying has been broken for a good while now (at least since version 9.4) - this change attempts to re-introduce them in their simplest and safest form possible.
I first introduced #79095 to make sure we don't disrupt or put additional load on our customer's data sources with this change in a patch release. Paired with this change, retries can now work as expected.
There's two small differences between how retries work now and how they used to work in legacy alerting.
Retries only occur for valid alert definitions - if we suspect that that error comes from a malformed alert definition, we skip retrying. We have added a constant backoff of 1s in between retries.
Once this is merged, I'll make sure to update:
With what we should do next.