-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Transformations: Use the display name of the original y field for the predicted field of the regression analysis transformation. #81332
Transformations: Use the display name of the original y field for the predicted field of the regression analysis transformation. #81332
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have you checked if this denigrates performance at all? I know this specific function (getFieldDisplayName) has created some recent problems for us, most specifically dealt with in this PR @leeoniya has up. 🤔 I don't think this should necessarily stop this change, but just something to keep in mind.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change looks good to me, bearing in mind my previous comment, and maybe waiting for the getFieldDisplayName
work to be merged first? 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - re: current performance issues with getFieldDisplayName I don't think that is a blocker on getting this work merged :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me as well! I agree that I think this would be fine on the performance front, but may be worth keeping an eye on it 😄
… predicted field of the regression analysis transformation. (#81332) Fix name of regression transformation field
What is this feature?
This sets a better name for the field with the predicted value from the regression analysis transformation
Why do we need this feature?
See #81317
Who is this feature for?
Users of the regression analysis transformation.
Which issue(s) does this PR fix?:
Fixes #81317
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please check that: