[v10.3.x] AuthProxy: Invalidate previous cached item for user when changes are made to any header #83203
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![grafana-delivery-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/329617?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
…made to any header (#81445) * fix: sign in using auth_proxy with role a -> b -> a would end up with role b * Update pkg/services/authn/clients/proxy.go Co-authored-by: Karl Persson <kalle.persson92@gmail.com> * Update pkg/services/authn/clients/proxy.go Co-authored-by: Karl Persson <kalle.persson92@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 9282c7a)
grafana-delivery-bot
bot
added
add to changelog
area/auth/authproxy
area/backend
backport
Jguer
approved these changes
Feb 22, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport 9282c7a from #81445
What is this feature?
fix: sign in using auth_proxy with role a -> b -> a would end up with role b
Why do we need this feature?
fixing a bug
Who is this feature for?
anyone who uses authproxy with role
Which issue(s) does this PR fix?:
Fixes #81327
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please check that: