You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
MetricData is currently assumed, not explicitly defined via a format byte. In practice, the first byte will typically be 0x89, but as @shanson7 points out, there could be a bit of a wider range in play in practice for users who have their own custom publishers that don't encode full MetricData payloads. I'm not aware of anying doing that, all "official" tools use 0x89, and all official docs refer to encoding the full MetricData payload, so it seems like a fair position to assume anything but 0x89 is unsupported. OTOH, in practice, tolerating the wider range wouldn't really cost us anything.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
see discussion at #2011 (comment)
MetricData is currently assumed, not explicitly defined via a format byte. In practice, the first byte will typically be 0x89, but as @shanson7 points out, there could be a bit of a wider range in play in practice for users who have their own custom publishers that don't encode full MetricData payloads. I'm not aware of anying doing that, all "official" tools use 0x89, and all official docs refer to encoding the full MetricData payload, so it seems like a fair position to assume anything but 0x89 is unsupported. OTOH, in practice, tolerating the wider range wouldn't really cost us anything.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: