Skip to content

[s3] Signature version "s3v4" is unsupported #2162

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi,

Indeed it works as is - I was spotted by another bug once I enabled multi-tenancy. So it took me some time to disctinct both issues.

so v4 works, no need for s3v4

Replies: 2 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by nsteinmetz
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #2155 on June 21, 2022 09:59.