Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rebase feat-remote-write-metadata on release-2.20.1-grafana #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2020

Conversation

gotjosh
Copy link

@gotjosh gotjosh commented Aug 20, 2020

I had a fair share of conflicts around QueueManager and its test so I'd appreciate a second look around that.

Remote write tests pass and Prometheus builds but I'd feel a bit more confident if we can run this in dev with metadata enabled for a bit to ensure everything is a-OK.

@gotjosh gotjosh changed the base branch from master to release-2.20.1-grafana August 20, 2020 11:26
@gotjosh gotjosh marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2020 13:46
@gotjosh gotjosh requested a review from rfratto August 20, 2020 13:46
Copy link
Member

@rfratto rfratto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I took a close look at QueueManager and it doesn't seem like this will break any existing behaviors.

Similarly to the WAL watcher, its purpose is to observe the scrape manager and pull metadata. Then, send it to a remote storage.

Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue@grafana.com>
@gotjosh gotjosh merged commit 3c51718 into release-2.20.1-grafana Aug 20, 2020
@gotjosh gotjosh deleted the feat-remote-write-metadata branch August 20, 2020 15:50
@gotjosh gotjosh restored the feat-remote-write-metadata branch August 20, 2020 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants