feat: add stackDepthMax builtin opt

[tomershafir]

No description provided.

[korniltsev]

LGTM

I wonder if in the future (not this PR) we should just allow passing arbitrary params/commsnds to the AP, so that there's less restrictions from the pyroscope-java

[tomershafir]

@korniltsev I think you need to make a decision:

1. Make pyroscope-java tightly coupled to ap, which makes sense because it's a great oss jvm profiler, and an alternative would be hard to find. Then, a single text param will make sense and be flexible.
2. Make pyroscope-java a simple, loosely coupled abstraction, with profiler agnostic interface. In this case I would even suggest to remove APExtraArgs from the generic interface, and extend it when needed.

I would go with 2.

[korniltsev]

Oh i forgot we already have APExtraArgs.

I am leaning towards 1 as you can see.