Clarify checks

[davidak]

After the last change (#22), there are now 2 pages which have the same heading:

Tracking: nixos-unstable's iso_minimal job for x86_64-linux.

https://r13y.com/iso_minimal/index.html
https://r13y.com/trivial/index.html

but they have different results.

Please clarify what is checked there.

[grahamc]

You're totally right, could you send a PR for that?

[davidak]

I don't know what to put there.

[grahamc]

I guess given

https://github.com/grahamc/r13y.com/blob/master/buildkite.yml#L19

• command: "./check.sh nixos:nixos.iso_minimal.x86_64-linux report-iso_minimal"

it'd be nixos.iso_minimal.x86_64-linux?

[davidak]

that's already there, but wtf is nixpkgs:stdenv.__bootPackages.stdenv.__bootPackages.stdenv.__bootPackages.stdenv.__bootPackages.stdenv.__bootPackages.binutils?

that looks as it can't be correct or should be simpler. what is that supposed to do exactly?

[grahamc]

It is correct. Each __bootPackages refers to a previous stage of bootstrapping. This is, I think, they very first binutils we produce.

On February 15, 2021, GitHub ***@***.***> wrote: that's already there, but wtf is nixpkgs:stdenv.__bootPackages.stdenv.__bootPackages.stdenv.__bootPackages.stdenv.__bootPackages.stdenv.__bootPackages.binutils? that looks as it can't be correct or should be simpler. what is that supposed to do exactly?

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#23 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe- auth/AAASXLGDAXCKRBE7KVEKDD3S7DZGFANCNFSM4XPLTROA>.